Philosophy

To contact us Click HERE
Are all humans just in existence to participate in the life of another? Or are all others in existence to participate in your own life, and you just don't know it? Welcome to mindfuck 101, bitches, a new segment on my blog where I talk about the questions I wonder in a day, such as are there more colours than what we can see? If so, what could be be called, or what would they look like? It's impossible to imagine what a colour you cannot see would look like, just try it now: Go on, prove me wrong. You can't, can you? That also brings the question, if we cannot understand what we cannot see, than how do we learn though the teaching of the events in the lives of others? They both follow the same premise, but with drastic differences. For one, learning is possible to do, and two, most things you will learn in your life are based on the experience or story of another person. If we can learn like this, why can we not learn certain things? In my opinion, the human mind has purposely blocked out these paths of learning for the reason of it rendering us incapable of not understanding. A double negative, meaning all people must be able to not understand in order to understand. Creepy, eh? Let's dig a little deeper into this psychological idea:
Imagine a man. His name is Bob. Bob has a wife, 2 children, a successful job, and a dog. Bob is your Average Joe, or "Average Bob". Bob woke up one day and became the person mentioned above, with the correct channels, or paths in the brain open completely to all understanding. Bob wouldn't know how to function. Think about this: How much learning do you do every day of your life? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, and for experiencing those ourselves, we are learning in a way that is not possible from just hearing the tales of a teacher or professor. If Bob already understands, and can no longer learn, he will have no possible comprehension of how to react in a scenario that requires learning.
You may be saying to yourself "Hey blogger, what the hell? If he already understands, why does learning matter?"
You're absolutely right, that in theory, learning doesn't matter. But you are also wrong. If you cannot learn, because you already know, than you cannot function. Humans maneuver naturally, out of instinct to learn in order to benefit themselves as individuals. If Bob already knows everything, he would have no purpose to move, go out, or live his life, and therefore, not be able to physically do anything. If a human cannot learn, than we mentally have no purpose, and would not be able to function.
This brings us back to the main topic of trying to see a colour you have never seen before: It cannot, will not, and should not ever be able to happen. The brain is purposely closed in order to deal prompt humans to go out, learn, and with that understand what you learn. We are limited for a reason, and in my opinion, this is the reason.